Pseudodarwinizm selekcjonistycznych modeli rozwoju nauki

The paper analyzes the incompatibility of Evolutionary Epistemology Theories (EET) with Charles Darwin’s theory evolution. argument consists four parts, each addressing a specific problem EET and offering examples. Firstly, advocates frequently misapply by asserting that evolution is teleological, which at odds Darwinism. Secondly, “universal Darwinism” underlying inconsistent relativism present in theory. Thirdly, because relativistic character theory, philosophies appeal to it need provide additional justification for using ideas outside biology, fails do. Finally, demonstrates Darwinocentric historiography proposed underappreciates neo-Lamarckism, whose model closer used EET.